Barley variety interacts positively with floor malting to produce different malts and beers

Campbell Morrissy; Curtis Davenport; Scott Fisk; Vern Johnson; Darrin Culp; Hayley Sutton; Harmonie Bettenhausen; Ron Silberstein; Patrick Hayes

doi:10.58430/jib.v130i1.43

Authors

Campbell Morrissy Oregon State University
Curtis Davenport Admiral Maltings
Scott Fisk Oregon State University
Vern Johnson Deschutes Brewery
Darrin Culp University of California
Hayley Sutton pFriem Family Brewers
Harmonie Bettenhausen Hartwick College
Ron Silberstein Admiral Maltings
Patrick Hayes Oregon State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58430/jib.v130i1.43

Keywords:

barley variety, winter barley, floor malting, malt quality

Abstract

Why was the work done: Floor malting maintains a small but notable market share due to its reputed contributions to beer flavour. These malts are viewed as premium products and are produced in both historic and contemporary floor maltings. Despite this, little work has been performed on floor malting to evaluate its effect on malt and subsequent beer quality and flavour. Accordingly, this work investigated whether floor malting produces distinct malts and beers relative to pneumatic maltings.

How was the work done: A mini-floor malting protocol was developed to malt small quantities of grain in a repeatable system that produces malt comparable to the production scale. Two winter barley varieties (Lontra and Thunder) were used to understand whether there was a malting type by variety interaction effect on beer flavour.

What are the main findings: Both floor and pneumatic malts produced similar malts and beers based on quality metrics and the differences found between malts were more attributable to variety and the respective rate of proteolysis. Sensory results showed that there was a significant malting type by variety interaction driving hedonic and descriptive sensory results.

Why is the work important: These results suggest that while the different malting types produce analytically similar malt, selection of barley variety can be used to optimise the floor malting process to produce distinct beer flavour profiles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AMBA. 2023. Guidelines for malting barley breeders.

Anness BJ, Bamforth C. 1982. Dimethyl sulphide - a review, J Inst Brew 88: 244–252.

Ares G, Antúnez L, Giménez A, Roigard C, Pineau B, Hunter DC, Jaeger SR. 2014. Further investigations into the reproducibility of check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization elicited by consumers. Food Qual Prefer 36: 111–121.

Bathgate GN. 2019. The influence of malt and wort processing on spirit character: the lost styles of Scotch malt whisky. J Inst Brew 125:200–213.

Beaven E. 1936. Barley for brewing since 1886. J Inst Brew 42:487–495.

Bettenhausen HM, Benson A, Fisk S, Herb D, Hernandez J, Lim J, Queisser SH, Shellhammer TH, Vega V, Xao L, Heuberger AL, Hayes PM. 2020. Variation in sensory attributes and volatile compounds in beers brewed from genetically distinct malts: an integrated sensory and non-targeted metabolomics approach. J Am Soc Brew Chem 78:136–152.

Blenkinsop P. 1991. The manufacture, characteristics, and uses of speciality malts. Tech Q Master Brew Assoc Am 28:145-149

Briggs DE. 1998. Malts and Malting. Blackie Academic, London, England.

CMBTC. 2022. CDC Copeland.

Coghe S, Martens E, D’Hollander H, Dirinck PJ, Delvaux FR. 2004. Sensory and instrumental flavour analysis of wort brewed with dark specialty malts. J Inst Brew 110:94–103.

Coghe S, Gheeraert B, Michiels A, Delvaux FR. 2006. Development of Maillard reaction related characteristics during malt roasting. J Inst Brew 112:148–156.

Dornbusch H. 2010. Brewing with the living past: floor-malted heirloom barleys for ales and lagers. The New Brewer 27:52-56.

Ferreira IM, Guido LF. 2018. Impact of wort amino acids on beer flavour: a review. Fermentation 4:1–13.

Griggs D. 2018. Does the technology of malting have an impact on the taste and aroma of base malt? Am Soc Brew Chemists - Malt Flavor and Aroma Symposium. Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Halstead M, Morrissy CP, Fisk S, Fox G, Hayes PM, Carrijo D. 2022. Barley grain protein is influenced by genotype, environment, and nitrogen management and is the major driver of malting quality. Crop Science 63:115-127.

Hayes PM, Filichkin T, Fisk S, Helgerson L, Meints B. 2019. Release of Thunder two-row winter barley. Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station.

Held S, Fox G. 2023. Simultaneous evaluation of β-glucan and β-glucanase relationship during different mash temperature profiles. J Am Soc Brew Chem 81:544-553.

Herb D, Filichkin T, Fisk S, Helgerson L, Hayes PM, Meints B, Jennings R, Monsour R, Tynan S, Vinkemeir K, Romagosa I, Moscou M, Carey D, Thiel R, Cistue L, Martens C, Thomas W. 2017. Effects of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) variety and growing environment on beer flavour. J Am Soc Brew Chem 75:345–353.

Herb D, Filichkin T, Fisk S, Helgerson L, Hayes PM, Benson A, Vega V, Carey D, Thiel R, Cistue L, Jennings R, Monsour R, Tynan S, Vinkemeier K, Li Y, Nguygen A, Onio A, Meints B, Moscou M, Romagosa I, Thomas W. 2017. Malt modification and its effects on the contributions of barley genotype to beer flavour. J Am Soc Brew Chem 75:354–362.

Hertrich J. 2013. Topics in brewing: malting barley. Tech Q Master Brew Assoc Am 50:29–41.

Hill AE, Stewart GG. 2019. Free amino nitrogen in brewing. Fermentation 5:1-11.

Hudson OP. 1986. Malting technology - Centenary review. J Inst Brew 92:115–122.

Kavanagh TE, Derbyshire RC, Hildebrand RP, Clark BJ, Meeker FJ. 1976. Dimethyl sulphide formation in malt - effect of malting conditions. J Inst Brew 82:270–272.

Kilfoil G, Kishnani MP, Speers RA. 2019. Comparing floor and pneumatic malting: effects on malt and beer quality. Mast Brew Assoc Am conference. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Kishnani P, Barr L, Speers RA. 2022. Evaluation of dimethyl sulfide thresholds. J Am Soc Brew Chem 80:109-11.

Li Y, Nguyen A, Lodge B, Onio A, Santiano S, Watts P, Beattie A, Badea A, Capettini F. 2022. Examination of influence of barley variety and growing location on beer sensory attributes. Tech Q Master Brew Assoc Am 59:91-101.

Macey, A. 1958. Oil firing in the malting industry II. Effects of oil firing. J Inst Brew 64: 222-226.

Mackie AE, Slaughter JC. 2000. Key steps during barley malting that influence the concentration of flavor compounds. J Am Soc Brew Chem 58:69–72.

Marshall FG. 1952. Recent developments in the malting industry. J Inst Brew 59:10–15.

Meilgaard MC. 1976. Wort composition: with special reference to the use of adjuncts. Tech Q Master Brew Assoc Am 13:78–90.

Morrissy CP, Féchir M, Bettenhausen HM, Van Simaeys KR, Fisk S, Hernandez J, Mathias K, Benson A, Shellhammer TH, Hayes PM. 2022a. Continued exploration of barley genotype contribution to base malt and beer flavor through the evaluation of lines sharing Maris Otter parentage. J Am Soc Brew Chem 80:201-214.

Morrissy CP, Davenport C, Hooper A, Fisk S, Bettenhausen HM, Hayes PM. 2022b. The effect of floor-malting on novel barley germplasm derived from a cross with Maris Otter®. Tech Q Master Brew Assoc Am 59:63-73.

Morrissy CP, Halstead M, Féchir M, Carrijo D, Fisk S, Johnson V, Bettenhausen HM, Shellhammer TH, Hayes PM. 2023a. Barley variety and growing location provide nuanced contributions to beer flavor using elite germplasm in commercial-type malts and beers. J Am Soc Brew Chem 81:404-415.

Morrissy CP, Filichkin T, Fisk S, Helgerson L, Davenport C, Silberstein R, Culp D, Hayes PM. 2023b. Registration of “Lontra” malting barley: a two-row, winter-habit cultivar of interest to the craft malting and brewing industries. J Plant Regist 1-10.

Müller C, Kleinwaechter M, Selmar D, Methner FJ. 2013. The influence of elevated steeping temperatures on the resulting malt homogeneity and malt quality. BrewSci 66: 114–122.

NOAA. 2022. Klamath River Basin, NOAA Fisheries.

O’Sullivan TF, Walsh Y, O’Mahony A, Fitzgerald GF, Van Sinderen D. 1999. A comparative study of malthouse and brewhouse microflora. J Inst Brew 105:55–61.

Piendl A. 1976. Barley variety and malting technology as influencing factors on the properties of malt - an evaluation by means of the analysis of variance. Tech Q Master Brew Assoc Am 13:131–141.

Pitz WJ. 1987. Factors affecting S-Methylmethionine levels in malt. J Am Soc Brew Chem, 45:53–60.

Saison D, De Schutter D, Uyttenhove B, Delvaux FR. 2009. Contribution of staling compounds to the aged flavour of lager beer by studying their flavour thresholds. Food Chem 114:1206–1215.

Sayre-Chavez B, Bettenhausen HM, Windes S, Aron P, Cistué L, Fisk S, Helgerson L, Heuberger AL, Tynan S, Muñoz-Amatraín M. 2022. Genetic basis of barley contributions to beer flavour. J Cereal Sci 104:103430.

Snyder P. 2018. Water demand, adaptive capacity, and drought: an analysis of the Upper Klamath basin, Oregon and California. MS thesis, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA, USA.

Stone H. 1992. Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA), in Hootman, C. (ed.) Manual on Descriptive Analysis Testing for Sensory Evaluation. American Society for Testing and Materials, 15–21.

Vandermolen K, Horangic A. 2018. Implications of regulatory drought for farmer use of climate information in the Klamath basin. Weather Clim Soc 10:269–274.

Whitmore ET, Spahrow DHB. 1957. Laboratory micro-malting technique. J Inst Brew 63:397-398.

Wilson R. 2021. University of California Intermountain Research and Extension Center: 2021 Spring research update.

Windes S, Bettenhausen HM, Van Simaeys KR, Clawson J, Fisk S, Heuberger AL, Lim J, Queisser S, Shellhammer TH, Hayes PM. 2021. Comprehensive analysis of different contemporary barley genotypes enhances and expands the scope of barley contributions to beer flavor. J Am Soc Brew Chem 79:281-305.

Yang B, Schwarz P, Horsley R. 1998. Factors involved in the formation of two precursors of dimethylsulfide during malting. J Am Soc Brew Chem 56:85–92.

Yin XS. 2021. Malt. American Society of Brewing Chemists, St. Paul, MN, USA.