The influence of yeast format and pitching rate on Scotch malt whisky fermentation kinetics and congeners

Authors

  • Struan Reid Heriot-Watt University
  • Alex Speers Dalhousie University
  • William Lumsden The Glenmorangie Company
  • Nicholas Willoughby Heriot-Watt University
  • Dawn Maskell Heriot-Watt University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58430/jib.v129i2.18

Keywords:

fermentation, whisky, new make spirit, yeast, pitching rate, format

Abstract

Yeast format and pitching rate are variables which can be easily manipulated in a distillery environment but are seldom altered. Fermentations using dried and liquid yeast were studied at laboratory scale and compared by application of a 4-parameter logistic model to measurements of the decline in apparent extract during fermentation. Congener analysis of new make distillate allowed comparison between compounds of interest produced during fermentation.  The liquid yeast format demonstrated a significant reduction (p<0.05) in lag time, which was 68% shorter than dried yeast. Despite this, longer overall fermentation times were observed due to a slower exponential phase as compared to the dried yeast format. Alteration of the yeast pitching rate using dried and liquid formats, demonstrated that high rates resulted in reduced lag times. The maximum fermentation rates (Vmax) were assessed from the fermentation models and no consistent trend could be identified. Dried yeast was observed to achieve its maximum fermentation rate when underpitched. Substantially higher Vmax ­values were obtained with overpitched liquid yeast fermentations, resulting in faster fermentations, compared to underpitched liquid yeast fermentations. The liquid yeast format created more esters compared to dried yeast. The concentration of ethyl esters generally trended downwards for fermentations pitched with less yeast which fully attenuated. By combining the results of these studies, distillers can make informed decisions to optimise spirit character, quality, and distillery production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Struan Reid, Heriot-Watt University

International Centre for Brewing and Distilling

Alex Speers, Dalhousie University

Canadian Institute of Fermentation Technology

William Lumsden, The Glenmorangie Company

The Glenmorangie Company

Nicholas Willoughby, Heriot-Watt University

Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering

Dawn Maskell, Heriot-Watt University

International Centre for Brewing and Distilling

References

Armstrong M, Macintosh AJ, Josey M, Speers RA. 2018. Examination of premature yeast flocculation in U.K. malts. Tech Q Master Brew Assoc Am 55:54–60.

ASBC. 2016. Yeast-4 - Microscopic cell counting. ASBC Methods of Analysis Yeast-4, 1–2.

ASBC. 2012. Yeast-14 - Miniature fermentation assay. ASBC Methods of Analysis Yeast-14, 1–4.

ASBC. 2010. Yeast-3 - Yeast stains. ASBC Methods of Analysis Yeast-3, 1–4.

Berbert de Amorim Neto H, Pearson SY, Walker JW, Walker GM, Brosnan JM. 2008. Application of novel yeast strains to the Scotch whisky fermentation process, p 154–158. In Bryce JH, Piggot JR, Stewart GG (ed), Distilled Spirits - Tradition and Innovation. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, England.

Berbert de Amorim Neto H, Yohannan BK, Bringhurst TA, Brosnan JM, Pearson SY, Walker JW, Walker GM. 2009. Evaluation of a Brazilian fuel alcohol yeast strain for Scotch whisky fermentations. J Inst Brew 115:198–207.

Black K, Daute M, Tziboula-Clarke A, White PJ, Iannetta PPM, Walker G. 2020. Utilization of low nitrogen barley for production of distilling quality malt. J Am Soc Brew Chem 0:1–7.

Browning PD, Nimmo H, Jenson I. 1994. Factors limiting the growth of yeast in malt whisky wort, p 286–293. In Campbell I, Priest FG (eds), Proc 4th Aviemore Conf on Malting, Brewing & Distilling. Institute of Brewing, London, England.

Burdock GA. 2010. Fenaroli’s Handbook of Flavour Ingredients, 6th ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.

Casey G, Ingledew W. 1983. High-gravity brewing: influence of pitching rate and wort gravity on early yeast viability. J Am Soc Brew Chem 4:4–8.

Cheung AWY, Brosnan JM, Phister T, Smart KA. 2012. Impact of dried, creamed and cake supply formats on the genetic variation and ethanol tolerance of three Saccharomyces cerevisiae distilling strains. J Inst Brew 118:152–162.

Collicutt H. 2009. Whisky: Grain mashing and fermentation, p 413-430. In Ingledew WM, Kelsall DR, Austin GD, Kluhspies C (eds), The Alcohol Textbook. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, England.

Cutaia AJ, Reid AJ, Speers RA. 2009. Examination of the relationships between original, real and apparent extracts, and alcohol in pilot plant and commercially produced beers. J Inst Brew 115:318–327.

Daute M, Jack F, Baxter I, Harrison B, Grigor J, Walker G. 2021. Comparison of three approaches to assess the flavour characteristics of Scotch whisky spirit. Appl Sci 11:1410.

Daute M, Jack F, Harrison B, Walker G. 2021. Experimental whisky fermentations: influence of wort pretreatments. Foods 10:2755.

Degre R, Kraus K, Zhang Z. 2011. Stabilised liquid yeast preparation, a method for producing the same, and the use thereof. US7968320B2.

Ensor M, Bryce JH, Hill AE. 2015. An investigation into the use of different yeast strains and Lactobacillus on new make spirit, p 243–248. In Goodall I, Fotheringham RN, Murray D, Speers RA, Walker GM (eds). Distilled Spirits - Future Challenges, New Solutions. Context Publications, Ashby-de-la-Zouch, England.

Erten H, Tanguler H, Cak H. 2007. The effect of pitching rate on fermentation and flavour compounds in high gravity brewing. J Inst Brew 113:75–79.

Ferrarini R, Bocca E, Cavazza A. 2007. Mechanical dispersion procedures improve the rehydration of active dry yeast. Enzyme Microb Tech 40:1251–1255.

Gibson BR, Lawrence SJ, Leclaire JPR, Powell CD, Smart KA. 2007. Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:535–569.

Gonçalves M, Pontes A, Almeida P, Barbosa R, Serra M, Libkind D, Hutzler M, Gonçalves P, Sampaio JP. 2016. Distinct domestication trajectories in top-fermenting beer yeasts and wine yeasts. Curr Biol 26:2750–2761.

Haukeli AD, Lie S. 1971. Experimental conditions affecting yeast growth. J Inst Brew 77:253–258.

Hill AE, Robitaille JLF, Crisp J. 2018. Straying from the crowd: novel yeasts for new make, p 99-102. In Jack F, Dabrowska D, Davies S, Garden M, Maskell DL, Murray D (eds). Distilled Spirits - Local Roots; Global Reach. Context Publications, Ashby-de-la-Zouch, England.

Ingledew WM. 2017. Commercial yeast production for distilled beverage and fuel ethanol fermentation, p 299-320. In Walker GM, Abbas C, Ingledew WM, Pilgrim C (eds). The Alcohol Textbook. Ethanol Technology Institute, Milwaukee, USA.

Ingledew, WM. 2009. Yeast stress in the fermentation process, p 115-126. In Ingledew WM, Kelsall DR, Austin GD, Kluhspies C (ed). The Alcohol Textbook. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, England.

Jenkins DM, Powell CD, Fischborn T, Smart KA. 2011. Rehydration of active dry brewing yeast and its effect on cell viability. J Inst Brew 117:377–382.

Jenkins DM, Powell CD, Smart KA. 2010. Dried yeast: Impact of dehydration and rehydration on brewing yeast DNA integrity. J Am Soc Brew Chem 68P:132–138.

Krogerus K, Magalhães F, Vidgren V, Gibson B. 2017. Novel brewing yeast hybrids: creation and application. Appl Microb Biotech.

Lake JC, Speers RA, Porter AV, Gill T.A. 2008. Miniaturizing the fermentation assay: effects of fermentor size and fermentation kinetics on detection of premature yeast flocculation. J Am Soc Brew Chem 66:94–102.

MacIntosh AJ, Josey M, Speers RA. 2016. An examination of substrate and product kinetics during brewing fermentations. J Am Soc Brew Chem 74:250–257.

Manson DH, Slaughter JC. 1986. Methods for predicting yeast fermentation activity, p 295-297. In Campbell, I, Priest, FG (eds). Proc 2nd Aviemore Conf on Malting, Brewing & Distilling. Institute of Brewing, London, England.

Muir-Taylor V. 2020. Yeast selection for Scotch malt whisky fermentations: an assessment of commercially available active dried yeast strains. MRes thesis. Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Odumeru JA, D’Amore T, Russell I, Stewart GG. 1992. Effects of heat shock and ethanol stress on the viability of a Saccharomyces uvarum (carlsbergensis) brewing yeast strain during fermentation of high gravity wort. J Ind Microbiol 10:111–116.

Pratt-Marshall P. 2002. High gravity brewing - an inducer of yeast stress: Its effect on cellular morphology and physiology. PhD Thesis. Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Ramsay CM, Berry DR. 1984. The effect of inoculum level on the formation of higher alcohols, fatty acids and esters in the malt whisky fermentation. Food Microbiol 1:111–115.

Reid SJ. 2021. Modelling Scotch malt whisky fermentations and impact of fermentation on new make spirit character. PhD Thesis. Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Reid SJ, Josey M, MacIntosh AJ, Maskell DL, Speers RA. 2021. Predicting fermentation rates in ale, lager and whisky. Fermentation 7:13.

Reid SJ, Speers RA, Willoughby N, Lumsden WB, Maskell DL. 2020. Pre-fermentation of malt whisky wort using Lactobacillus plantarum and its influence on new make spirit character. Food Chem 320:126605.

Richards C. 2015. Diversity of yeast supply for distilled spirit fermentations, p 37-42. In Goodall I, Fotheringham RN, Murray D, Speers RA, Walker GM (eds). Distilled Spirits - Future Challeneges, New Solutions. Context Publications, Ashby-de-la-Zouch, England.

Russell I. 2003. Understanding yeast fundamentals, p 85-120. In Jacques KA, Lyons TP, Kelsall DR (eds), The Alcohol Textbook. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, England.

Russell I, Stewart GG. 2014. Distilling Yeast and Fermentation, p 123-146. In Russell I, Stewart GG (eds), Whisky: Technology, Production and Marketing. Academic Press, Oxford, England.

Saita M, Nagata Y. 1986. The influence of temperature and time on the formation of aroma compounds during fermentation of all-malt wort, p 316-319. In Campbell I, Priest FG (eds), Proc 2nd Aviemore Conf on Malting, Brewing & Distilling. Institute of Brewing, London, England.

Sim GB, Berry DR. 1996. Malted barley enzyme activity under optimum and process conditions from the scotch malt whisky industry. Enzyme Microb Tech 19:26–31.

Speers RA, Rogers P, Smith B. 2003. Non-linear modelling of industrial brewing fermentations. J Inst Brew 19:229–235.

Stewart GG. 2017. Brewing and Distilling Yeasts. Springer International Publishing, New York City, USA.

Verbelen PJ, Dekoninck TML, Saerens SMG, van Mulders SE, Thevelein JM, Delvaux FR. 2009. Impact of pitching rate on yeast fermentation performance and beer flavour. Appl Microb Biotechnol 82:155–167.

Vigil T. 2017. Distillation practice, p 427-440. In Walker GM, Abbas C, Ingledew WM, Pilgrim C (eds), The Alcohol Textbook. Ethanol Technology Institute, Milwaukee, USA.

Vriesekoop F, Rathband A, MacKinlay J, Bryce JH. 2010. The evolution of dextrins during the mashing and fermentation of all-malt whisky production. J Inst Brew 116:230–238.

Walker JW, Pearson SY, Bringhurst TA, Brosnan JM. 2008. Towards improved distilling yeast: effect of wort gravity and pitching rate on fermentation performance, p 142-147. In Bryce JH, Piggot JR, Stewart GG (eds), Distilled Spirits - Production, Technology and Innovation. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, England.

Watson DC. 1981. The development of specialised yeast strains for use in Scotch malt whisky fermentations. Advances in Biotechnology. Pergamon Press Canada Ltd, North York, Canada.

Waymark C, Hill AE. 2021. The influence of yeast strain on whisky new make spirit aroma. Fermentation 7:311.

Downloads

Published

10-07-2023 — Updated on 06-02-2024

Versions

How to Cite

Reid, S., Speers, A., Lumsden, W., Willoughby, N., & Maskell, D. (2024). The influence of yeast format and pitching rate on Scotch malt whisky fermentation kinetics and congeners. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 129(2), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.58430/jib.v129i2.18 (Original work published July 10, 2023)