Heat resistance of Lactobacillus brevis, Pediococcus acidilactici and Enterococcus faecium in buffer (pH 4), alcoholic and alcohol-free beer

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58430/jib.v130i3.59

Keywords:

non-alcholic beer, heat resistance, beer spoilage, Pediococcus acidilactici ATCC 8042, Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354, surrogate, Lactobacillus brevis BSO 566

Abstract

Why was the work done: To measure the heat resistance of three vegetative bacteria in buffer (pH 4), alcoholic and alcohol-free beer. To verify that Pediococcus acidilactici ATCC 8042 and Lactobacillus brevis BSO 566 are as heat resistant as previously reported and to establish if Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 could have application in validation studies for the pasteurisation of beer.

How was the work done: : The heat resistance of L. brevis, P. acidilactici and E. faecium in buffer, alcoholic and alcohol-free beer was determined using two approaches  - capillary test tubes and flask method.

What are the main findings: E. faecium was the most heat resistant microorganism in all three liquids. D values were significantly greater, and z-values were similar or significantly greater than the corresponding values of L. brevis and P. acidilactici.

Why is the work important: E. faecium is used in the food industry as a pathogenic surrogate for the validation of thermal and non-thermal processes.  The work reported here suggests that E. faecium can also be used for the validation of pasteurisation of beer. Its high z-value suggests that at higher pasteurisation temperatures (>65°C) it may be more resistant than yeast ascospores and could therefore be used as an indicator for flash pasteurisation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams MR, O'Brien PJ, Taylor GT. 1989. Effect of the ethanol content of beer on the heat-resistance of a spoilage Lactobacillus. J Appl Bacteriol 66:491-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb04569.x

Almond Board of California 2014. Guidelines for using Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 as a surrogate microorganism in almond process validation.

Annous BA, Kozempel MF. 1998. Influence of growth medium on thermal resistance of Pediococcus sp. NRRL B-2354 (formerly Micrococcus freudenreichii) in liquid foods. J Food Prot 61:578-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-61.5.578

Bianchini A, Stratton J, Weier S, Hartter T, Plattner B, Rokey G, Hertzel G, Gompa L, Martinez B, Eskridge KM. 2014. Use of Enterococcus faecium as a surrogate for Salmonella enterica during extrusion of a balanced carbohydrate-protein meal. J Food Prot 77:75-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-220

Ceylan E, Bautista DA. 2015. Evaluating Pediococcus acidilactici and Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 as thermal surrogate microorganisms for Salmonella for in-plant validation studies of low-moisture pet food products. J Food Prot 78:934-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-271

Condón S, Arrizubieta MJ, Sala FJ. 1993. Microbial heat resistance determinations by the multipoint system with the thermoresistometer TR-SC Improvement of this methodology. J Microbiol 18:357-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(93)90017-C

Deen B, Diez-Gonzalez F. 2019. Assessment of Pediococcus acidilactici ATCC 8042 as potential Salmonella surrogate for thermal treatments of toasted oats cereal and peanut butter. Food Microbiol 83:187-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.05.015

EBC Technology and Engineering Forum 1995. Beer Pasteurisation: Manual of Good Practice, Nürnberg, Getränke-Fachverlag Hans Carl.

Gaze J. 2006. Pasteurisation: A Food Industry Practical Guide, 2nd edition (Guideline No. 51), Campden & Chorleywood Food Research Association.

Gu K, Sekhon AS, Richter JK, Yang Y, Pietrysiak E, Michael M, Ganjyal GM. 2022. Heat resistance comparison of Salmonella and Enterococcus faecium in cornmeal at different moisture levels. Int J Food Microbiol 368:1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109608

Jordan JS, Gurtler JB, Marks HM, Jones DR, Shaw WK, Jr. 2011. A mathematical model of inactivation kinetics for a four-strain composite of Salmonella Enteritidis and Oranienburg in commercial liquid egg yolk. Food Microbiol 28:67-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.08.008

Jordan KN, Cogan TM. 1999. Heat resistance of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from cheddar cheese. Lett Appl Microbiol 29:136-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00607.x

L'Anthoën NC, Ingledew WM. 1996. Heat resistance of bacteria in alcohol-free beer. J Am Soc Brew Chem 54:32-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/ASBCJ-54-0032

Ma L, Kornacki JL, Zhang G, Lin CM, Doyle MP. 2007. Development of thermal surrogate microorganisms in ground beef for in-plant critical control point validation studies. J Food Prot 70:952-957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-70.4.952

Martinez S, Lopez M, Bernardo A. 2003. Thermal inactivation of Enterococcus faecium: effect of growth temperature and physiological state of microbial cells. Lett Appl Microbiol 37:475-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01431.x

McIlvaine TC. 1921. A buffer solution for colorimetric comparison. J Biol Chem 49:183-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)86000-8

Menegazzi GS, Ingledew WM. 1980. Heat processing of spent brewer's yeast. J Food Sci 45:182-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1980.tb02572.x

Ohkochi M, Takahashi R. 1982. Die bestimmung der hitzebeztandigkeit bierschadlicher Lacobacillen. Monat Brau 10, 317-322.

Pflug IJ. 2003. Measuring the thermal resistance of microorganisms: selecting an appropriate test system, correcting for heat-transfer lags, and determining minimum heating times. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 57:160-185.

Rachon G, Penaloza W, Gibbs PA. 2016. Inactivation of Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes and Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 in a selection of low moisture foods. Int J Food Microbiol 231:16-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.04.022

Rachon G, Raleigh CP, Betts G. 2022. The impact of isomerised hop extract on the heat resistance of yeast ascospores and in premium and alcohol-free lager. J Inst Brew 128:22-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.680

Rachon G, Raleigh CP, Pawlowsky K. 2021. Heat resistance of yeast ascospores and their utilisation for the validation of pasteurisation processes for beers. J Inst Brew 127:149-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.646

Rachon G, Rice CJ, Pawlowsky K, Raleigh CP. 2018. Challenging the assumptions around the pasteurisation requirements of beer spoilage bacteria. J Inst Brew 124:443-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.520

Reveron IM, Barreiro JA, Sandoval AJ. 2005. Thermal death characteristics of Lactobacillus paracasei and Aspergillus niger in Pilsen beer. J Food Eng 66:239-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.03.014

Sorqvist S. 2003. Heat resistance in liquids of Enterococcus spp., Listeria spp., Escherichia coli, Yersinia enterocolitica, Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. Acta Vet Scand 44:1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-44-1

Tajchakavit S, Ramaswamy HS, Fustier P. 1998. Enhanced destruction of spoilage microorganisms in apple juice during continuous flow microwave heating. Food Res Int 31:713-722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(99)00050-2

Tsang EWT, Ingledew WM. 2018. Studies on the heat resistance of wild yeasts and bacteria in beer. J Am Soc Brew Chem 40:1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/ASBCJ-40-0001

Zufall C, Wackerbauer K. 2000. The biological impact of flash pasteurisation over the wide temperature interval. J Inst Brew 106:163-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2000.tb00053.x

Downloads

Published

10-07-2024

How to Cite

Rachon , G., Raleigh, C., & Rothera, H. (2024). Heat resistance of Lactobacillus brevis, Pediococcus acidilactici and Enterococcus faecium in buffer (pH 4), alcoholic and alcohol-free beer. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 130(3), xxx-xxx. https://doi.org/10.58430/jib.v130i3.59